What happened
A verification control and a withdrawal control perform different actions. A slow check is not a reason to test the account through another delivery request. First determine whether you only inspected a recipient or already submitted an actual operation. Mixing those histories makes the original timeout harder to explain and can introduce unnecessary request records while you still lack the initial response.
What to check
Wait until the current check completes or shows its timeout before retrying the check itself. Read the saved link and the visible verification status. If a delivery identifier exists, inspect that record separately before taking another consequential action. If no operation was submitted, retry the read-only check later when the checker is available. Keep the times of attempts so support can distinguish one delayed request from several successive failures.
Worked example
For example, a user presses check, sees a delay, and considers withdrawal as a way to prove the account works. That would test a different operation, not complete the pending verification. Another user presses check repeatedly and then interprets the latest message as belonging to the first click. Waiting for a clear result and recording attempt times produces a more reliable sequence.
Result and next step
A resolved case has understandable verification attempts and no invented replacement delivery for diagnosis. An unavailable check remains unknown; it should not be presented as valid to bypass a delay. Report the public error, attempt times, and whether any real request identifier appeared. Read CASECS2 workflow guidance and Steam trading information. With withdrawals currently paused, preparing or retrying a recipient check does not create an offer, and the pause must remain distinct from the network symptom.